Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 01484976346. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
Some Asian guys have been calling me from this number claiming to be a recruitment agency that I have used in the past. When i call the number back it is answered by a lady clai...
This number calls every day claiming to be from British Gas. Asking for my bank details so they can refund me money! Do not answer!
Grimsby
NORTH SHIELDS
Phoned 4 times today, ambulance chasers, I left phone off the hook for 5 minutes, she was shouting “is anybody there?” constantly. Received more calls, all unanswered, around tea time.
SCAM- HMRC calls you saying you have a warrant for unpaid taxes.
Keep phoning me but not speaking, four calls one after another, this has now been four days of this
SCAM / SPAM - Caller said was from HMRC and said I should press 1 and enter my details and failure to comply would result in being arrested for fraud, quite ironic as it is the caller who should be arrested.
chocohollys hilperton wiltshire
ereomala atigolo london london
Called back, just peeped at me and hung up so seems likely spam. I know no one in Pontypridd, I live on a Scottish island!
Ventnor
London
stolen
afaf totty ellesmere ellesmere
Company pretending to be TalkTalk tech support who were wanting me to run something on my computer to fix the slow connection. They had my account number. Do Not Trust! Report to TalkTalk immediately and Block.
Enfield
paul grove shrewsbury shropshire
Spurious PPI claim. Block them!
The message claims to be a delivery driver from Evri saying that my parcel was unable to be delivered. In the message there was a HTML link. Needless to say I didn't follow it up. Seems sketchy.