Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 02088590222. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
Bank/Lonas
In addition to this number on my mobile, which I did not respond to, I had 2 other numbers in quick succession. They were 4475 1276391 and 4478 729 67737. The first suggesting I should link to a website - textilair, the second to strongsecurity and this last one to mbbgroups. As I suspected they were all scams, I did not respond to any.
Fraud
Fraud
This is a company called RTA Legal Advice. Been ringing me for days, I never answer. What I have found, however, is that if you actively reject the call, instead of just letting...
Missed call - didn't answer as soon as the number hung up a second number rang - 07488810402
said his name was Shaun, wanted to discuss my life insurance policy, I don't have one so that would be difficult, when I pressed him asking were he was calling from, he hun...
Call received asking for a Claire Quinn - not my name. They hung up as soon as I pointed this out.
web manager bedford bedforshire
Sheffield
Rang me - got cross with me asking questions, called me a liar several times and generally shouted abuse at me. Then they rang me again two hours later. This company is an absolute pest. They claim to have it on record that I worked in an industrial setting despite the fact that I never have.
Leatherhead
SCAM
Scam !!! Pretending to be virgin money fraud team
Country code 60 is Malaysia.
Courier
SPAM - called me at 1.30am
SCAM
Garbled beginning to phone call. Caller said she understood I d been involved in a car accident, and was that correct? I ended the call. While it is possible that it was a genuinely mistaken wrong number etc, my own opinion is that the tone and style of the caller suggested it was a deceptive enquiry. Whether it was telemarketing for a genuine firm of lawyers etc or phishing for more sinister purposes, I don t know.
London