Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 07525130390. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
+447525130390
The administration of the website called.co.uk invites you to post comments about this phone number.
the stump cross inn - pubs bars and inns Leeds
ladies hairdressers rosalind walsall
1 another translations liskeard other business activities
energy scammers
unisex hairdressers sarah leighton hairdressing (London)
beauty products john gosnell & co ltd lewes
SCAM
brighton fire alarms shoreham by sea manufacture of electrical machinery and apparatus nec
micro peripherals ltd accrington k business services
caller with Asian accent stated he was calling re a car accident I was supposed to have had two years agoI asked him for the make of car he was referring to, he asked if I was driving or a family member. I persisted with my question and he eventually repli
Safe number its Northumberland prison
Caller wanted to ask me questions. I politely asked him to take my number off his call list and not to call again. He replied "will call you every day, will call you every day, F**k you, F**k you, F**k you" and then hung up.
total pains.
2 days running this No. has called my mobile. Goes dead on answer.
paul reeve bsych sheringham health and social work
fashion shops chemille fashions - Port Talbot
holiday conference and leisure complex
word processing north london typewriter co (London)
Got a call from this number today, i know that this wasn't a genuine call as these cold calling companies now are changing the number that appears on your phone so it looks like a local number. This way you're more inclined to answer it. True enough it was