Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 02039965248. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
The overall rating for phone number 01434393187 is Harassing
2036557089
Safe number. Hillary Meredith Solicitors.
Paid number
n a rhos-y-gwaliau isle of ely
Hoax call from an AMS about my alleged accident I was never in! Blackwood area but not accent!
SCAM Allegedly from HMRC stating there is a fraud against me and a warrant out for my arrest.
London
SCAM / SPAM
product logic ltd sutton cheney warwickshire
This phone number is from the Energy Helpline, a trustworthy organisation in the mold of "uswitch" who help you find the cheapest energy plan and initiate the switch f...
here is evidently another round of these tiresome calls, claiming to be from a law firm , regarding an alleged minor car accident. From the accent, it is probably from the Sub-Continent and clearly rather sadly fraudulent. Ignore all protestations to the contrary.
Weird people with American voice talking about planning and budgeting? I told them to remove me off their list!
Automated message saying a transaction for £900 made against my visa card. My bank would not send this type of message, so fully aware it was a scam.
Caller claims they are about to disconnect our internet service due to illegal activity
Huddersfield
Tried to say they from our insurance company and they could reduce our bills.When asked to post the information out, she said couldn t unless we gave her the information over the phone. Number now blocked.
someone called me on this number, who is it
jessica baez calderin glasgow east renfrewshire
Definitely a scam call. I didn t field it at the time but used 1471 to identify it later. When I tried to call back, there was no such number.