Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 01443897858. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
birmingham city council local government birmingham b20 3aa
testing inspection and calibration tescon co ltd (London)
Insurance Agents and Companies Eagle Star Life Assurance Co. Ltd. Chelmsford
doctors general practitioners v s chandran - Merthyr Tydfil
Rang every night for 2 weeks till I answered then cold calling started again 4 weeks later, formed a complaint but had no response. Very annoying company!
auto dealers yeomans ltd worthing
computer systems and software great bridge software newton abbot
doctors general practitioners paramagnanam n - Cwmbran
business accomodation omega lettings ltd (London)
Private number
globe trekker st albans wholesale trade and commission trade
Called at 09-20. Asian sounding Gentleman, asked was he speaking to Mr C.............., said his name was Brian, and he said he was calling on behalf of some company the name of which I did not catch, asked him to repeat it and asked him what it was about,
hattons estate agents sutton coldfield b74 2eq
severnside software ltd gloucester
st francis adult education centre adult education birmingham b30 2aa
Betchworth
Scammers - take £4.50 every week - daughter was sent a text and opened by mistake - TalkTalk are aware of them and will block premium rate texts - also complained to Phonepay Plus - TalkTalk offered refund but they should be stopped (located in Holland or Germany)
scam someone on another site said this caller tried to get bank/card details
Business Consultants Gower Quality Systems Chelmsford
not worth answering - call centre, probably PPI again!