Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 01505862294. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
knitwear yarn reny martan sheffield
Caller calls on cellphone; never leaves message. Annoying. Nuisance Call.
SPAM
CLYDEBANK, GLASGOW
compton antiques antique dealers guildford gu3 1eg
SCAM this is a NI scam call. Recording first and then Indian call centre saying your NI number has been compromised. Complete bunch of crooks
deco r ite tilbury f construction
Survey about my Boiler Service, I was expecting it as service guy warned me dont mind giving anybody a good review if they have done a good job as long as they don t try to sell me anything.
hotels commodore hotel ltd the (London)
employment agencies and consultants drivers bureau & industrial services (London)
children homes penn house bognor regis
dry cleaning and alterations eva invisible menders ltd (London)
nursing homes beaumont view lancaster lancashire
SCAM / SPAM
surveyors and valuers wilmott property services (London)
sound city swindon recreational, cultural and sporting activities
London
National insurance number fraud scam
david christopher ltd ross on wye manufacture of furniture manufacturing nec
Sick of these calls... There are few similar numbers reported on these pages as a nuisance, scam and unsolicited bank services or just a recorded message (in this case be aware, this should be a trap to make you call them back - line is for shared costs!)... sometimes connected with the Pension review team, which can also be only a call centre working for them: 08437240459, 08437240463 and 08437240470 - see all of them same call centre 084372404xx and all for shared costs, so I assume this is good working m