Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 02086994442. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
Call preceded by text (which I was unable to reply to) saying they'd call, and wanted more information regarding my complaint. It said that if I miss the call I should ring a certain number and ask to speak to a certain person. My issue is that I have not made a complaint.
Don't answer
therapytec colchester
Sports Clubs St Helens Town A F C St Helens Merseyside
hotels the port inn
didn't answer and when i tryed calling back line went dead
no answere
SCAM / SPAM
The administration of the website called.co.uk invites you to post comments about this phone number.
machinery major equipment ltd. Morecambe lancashire
kudos information ltd. Information services woking gu22 9lg
Just answered a call from this number and they hung up when I said hello!
wedding services fairy tale dreams shrewsbury
local authority schools plymstock secondary school plymouth
r p assure limited london london
Nuisance call
ppi again aarrgghh
The administration of the website called.co.uk invites you to post comments about this phone number.
paintball (u k) ltd cobham 9234024 combat games
Line for shared costs, there are more similar numbers reported (just last 2 or 3 digits alternated) - so I assume this should be the same call centre. Similar numbers are reported as a telemarketing - scam PPI calls mainly. Did someone answer any number of this range? Is there any reason why companies use line with shared costs for just ringing you and left no message (other than scam...)? If this was a silent call for you, do not call back for any reason! Probably I am wrong with this one but started to be