Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 02089872591. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
Calling constantly
Cold called and hung up. Arse couldn't even dial like a Human.
Claims to be from Amazon trying to get details Scam
this is a phishing caller
This number wanted us to authorise 2 payments made from our bank account
Josh Cleverly, a cyber criminal acting as a Blockchain Recovery solicitor He uses this number to 02080970130
NHS Friendly number
SCAM My card is getting charged
Fraud
Recording in Chinese. One of many I am getting in Chinese language and the words "DHL" are often mentioned so I am saying its a parcel delivery scam. For Chinese!
Friendly number and if you looking for a good deal just can find here.!
Safe number Wolverhampton library
SCAM
This number rang twice and a message was left but the voice is so faint we are unable to understand what was said. No idea who this number is.
Warning "Silent call - hung up"
Silent call
looks like spam calls. they call, they now my name. call suddenly disconnects
They called Yesterday Afternoon, I didn't answer this call but my mobile marked it as SPAM automatically in my missed calls.
3 silent calls and when called back a recorded message states "This number is no longer in service" Beware as other sites are reporting a scam call!
SPAM Telemarketing <01913003718> Thursday 14th June 2023 11:02am: "Abi(sic) King" seemingly from a call centre (noisy background) asked to speak to managing director of our business by name, refused to disclose reason for the call except "he will know what it's about", and when pressed "regarding Rubix." When the caller realised they weren't getting through to the MD they tried another shareholder by name (silent partner, assumed all information obtained from companies h