Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 02889584909. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
+442889584909
scam survey
Debt management company based in Stirling called Back On Track.
raytel group ltd rayleigh d manufacturing
florists retail flowers by jan aldershot hampshire
auctioneers bennet & days newcastle
delta vacations
ambulance chasers
quality couplings ltd high wycombe d manufacturing
four dee northern ireland ltd trailers and towing eqpt magherafelt county londonderry
this number is reliance advisory trying to get info about PPI, but will not remove my details from their system even though I requested this several times. Saying I had made a claim which I have not, saying I have applied for a loan which I have not.
photographers creative camera work llanidloes
saddlery and riding wear thorowgood ltd walsall
counselling and advice marriage care (London)
Scam callere
silverfish supply blackpool g wholesale and retail
Refrigeration equipments tan - ffwrdd co Ltd - Llanelli
tunbridge wells grammar school for boys tunbridge wells general secondary education
bulb growers j c r cowle chulmleigh
Fed up with getting calls from this number!!!!!
Line for shared costs, there are more similar numbers reported (just last 2 or 3 digits alternated) - so I assume this should be the same call centre. This seems to be some good working money trap, similar numbers are reported as a scam offers (in most cases some PPI company). I recommend to block the whole 0843724xxxx range... Did someone answer any number of this range? People I am sick of these numbers... please just one good and professional service - but such would not use line for shared costs, right.