Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 01543676149. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
+441543676149
the lead laboratory exeter dev
Woking
International call from Bristol. Do they think we are that stupid. Amazon please get your act together.
Salford
Random call, probably war dialer. Been called every night this week by different 01 numbers!
Calls from this number, when I answer no one there.
London
Private number
This number always hangs up when I answer
Leamington Spa
Bloody pest. Now blocked from future calls
Called my mobile, real human being - waited for answerphone, mentioned my name, then played a tape of John Cleese naming the company. One to block
SPAM
Teddington
Automat
Printerland sell printers and this is one of the sales numbers. The call I got was not unsolicited.
Wood Green
SCAM Call Themselves 'Domestic Appliances'. Phoned numerous times, totally ignore Telephone Preference Service as they have been told I have registered for this service. They have no information on my appliance as it was fitted by friend who runs a business in this market. It is a marketing company trying to sell something (of what use I don't know). DO NOT EVEN ENTERTAIN THEM. THEY ARE THERE TO RIP YOU OFF. PUT THE PHONE DOWN ASAP.
lisa reynolds east sussex east sussex
I subscribe to The Economist, and renewed my subscription very late this year, a few days after the expiry. I finally picked up this call after several days and they said they wanted to know if I would renew my Economist subscription. I said that I already had, and they said "Oh, let me check my new system. Oh yes, you have, that s ok then." and that was all. A little odd, but seems like the Economist gives them the opportunity to salvage some lapsed subscriptions.