Please add your review about this phone number.
Write a long comment about your experience with phone number 01902859134. You can also use the buttons to describe calls. The last button clicked changes the rating. Here's what they mean:
- Positive - all good, friendly, or safe.
- Neutral - neither good nor bad, just alright.
- Annoying - like unwanted or automated calls.
- Dangerous - dodgy stuff, like scams or spam.
After rating, don't forget to share your experience by clicking the SHARE social buttons!
quite a rude guy selling backup strategies, I wouldn t answer
Call center
parker manchester
Warwick
PLYMOUTH
Vanquis are an ABSOLUTE NIGHTMARE I paid today yet they are still ringing me numerous times ( i made a promise to pay two weeks ago), they call about ten times a day from different numbers!! Drives me insane. Sooner its paid off the bloody better. Trucaller blocks their calls automatically now
Charfield
Telemarketing
I GET A TRAIN I will never get a car so wish these people would stop saying about a "Car accident". use Scam Blaster to stop them!
Manchester
I got a call from this number this morning: Good morning mam, this is Blackmore claims, how are you this morning? I hung up. Another insurance scam.
London
This is a debt company called CARS asking me to confirm my name and address? I said no in at work, she said ok I ll call u back at a later time. Very sneaky as my area code is 01905 an thought it was a legitimate call.
I received a call from this number this morning. The caller had my name. When I asked who was calling, the man stated that it was Direct Claims Group regarding the minor accident I'd had. I replied that 'You must mean the minor accident that I haven't had!' and told him to get off the line. When I checked Companies House records, there were two companies called 'Direct Claims Group'. One was dissolved in 2018 and the other in 2019. So the call was definitely annoying and probably suspicious.
SCAM
Services
H
goldtop legal services limited london n a
Services
Definitely a scam call. I didn t field it at the time but used 1471 to identify it later. When I tried to call back, there was no such number.